Find out which of yourconfident answers are wrong.
Nine kits each read one part of what you shipped — the browser line, the data rules, who's allowed to do what, the money path, keys, test vs. live. The tenth asks what you'd have said about each part before you looked, and a rollup reads the two against each other — because a false belief you never flagged is the dangerous kind, not the gap you already knew about.
The dangerous answers are the confident ones.
Ask anybody who shipped something built this way and they can list three things they don't understand about it. Those three are fine — they're on a list, and lists get worked through. The problem is the fourth thing: the one you'd have answered instantly, without pausing, and would have been wrong about.
It never made a list because it never felt like a gap — it felt exactly like knowing, which is the only way this ever goes wrong. No single kit can find that on its own: a kit tells you what's there, it has no idea what you thought was there. That comparison is a fact about the pair, and it's why this bundle exists as one thing, not ten separate purchases.
Ten kits. The whole Past the Prototype line.
Each tool is the same full product sold on its own page — nothing trimmed for the bundle. Click any card to see the individual product page.
Can You Explain Your Own App?
Whether you can name — and have actually seen — every area of your own app.
View productThe Browser Line Read-Off
Which checks are enforced vs. trust the browser.
View productLogged-In Is Not Allowed
Whether your server checks who's asking, not just that they're signed in.
View productThe Supabase RLS Read-Off
Whether row-level security locks a row, or just wears the badge.
View productThe Data Model Sanity Bench
Whether the table can hold a rule at all, or you are the constraint.
View productThe Money Path Teardown
What the app really does when a payment succeeds — every step.
View productThe Test Mode vs Live Mode Line-Up
Which world each service points at — sandbox or the real one.
View productThe Keys & Secrets Sorting Drill
Which keys are safe to ship, which to move, which to rotate.
View productThe Accept-or-Revert Ladder
Whether you can get back if an AI-suggested change is wrong.
View productWhat You Now Hold
An inventory of what you're now storing about people.
View productBought separately: $600 · Bundle: $459 — 24% off the whole line.
Claimed against found — and nothing else produces that.
Say what you believe
Can You Explain Your Own App? asks, area by area — the front door, the data layer, the money path — whether you can name the thing and whether you've actually seen it. Ten minutes, before you touch anything else.
Run what's actually there
The other nine kits report what's structurally true, independent of what you claimed — who the browser trusts, what your rules say, what happens when a payment lands, which keys go where.
Read one against the other
The rollup compares your account against the findings, area by area: CONFIRMED, KNEW ALREADY, YOU WERE WRONG, or NOT RUN. It computes no score of its own — every line traces back to a kit you ran and a sentence you wrote yourself.
The nine structural kits split naturally into the front door (who gets in, what's decided where), the data layer (what your tables can hold, what you're holding), and before you take money (what really happens on a payment, in which world, with which keys) — this bundle is all ten, plus the rollup that reads the tenth against the other nine.
Three rules the rollup will not bend.
The rollup computes no score of its own. Every reading traces to a kit you ran and a sentence you wrote yourself — held to the same three rules every time.
A false belief ranks below an admitted gap
YOU WERE WRONG sits under KNEW ALREADY. A gap you admitted to was already going to get closed. A belief that turns out false is one you've been building on, and it stays true tomorrow unless something breaks the comfort.
Being wrong about scope is its own reading
Saying an area doesn't apply, then finding problems in it, isn't a wrong answer about a detail — it's a wrong answer about the shape of your own app. Counted on its own line, because the fix is different from anything else here.
Being careful costs you nothing
Say you couldn't explain something and the kit finds it's fine — that reads CONFIRMED, and the row says you were careful and it worked out. Punishing honest uncertainty would just teach confident answers, the exact failure this exists to catch.
For the person who shipped something they didn't write.
Builders who shipped something they didn't fully write
You built and shipped something real with an AI tool and want to work through it properly — not guess which of the ten parts of your app still need a look.
Teams past the demo, before real users
You've run one or two of these kits already and want the rest, plus the reading that joins them — the whole line once, instead of nine separate decisions.
Anyone with confident answers about their own app
If you'd answer instantly and without pausing when asked how your auth, your data rules, or your payment path actually work, this is built to find out which of those answers are wrong.
One purchase. Ten kits. Save $141.
- Can You Explain Your Own App?$59
- The Browser Line Read-Off$59
- Logged-In Is Not Allowed$59
- The Supabase RLS Read-Off$69
- The Data Model Sanity Bench$69
- The Money Path Teardown$69
- The Test Mode vs Live Mode Line-Up$49
- The Keys & Secrets Sorting Drill$49
- The Accept-or-Revert Ladder$59
- What You Now Hold$59
- Bought separately$600
Already own a few of these? Each kit also stands alone — buy the whole line only if the rollup's claimed-against-found reading is worth more to you than the individual pieces. See all RedHub bundles for smaller groupings of this same line.
Answers before you ask.
No. Anything you have not run reads NOT RUN, and the rollup says so rather than quietly treating it as fine — a check you have not run is not a check that passed. It will not give you the top verdict while anything is missing, and it names the next one to run in build order. Two clean of ten is two clean of ten.
Because a gap you admitted to was going to get closed — that is what admitting it does. A belief that turns out to be false is one you have been building on, and it will still be there tomorrow unless something breaks the comfort. It never made your list because it never felt like a gap. It felt like knowing.
That is counted on its own line. It is not a wrong answer about a detail, it is a wrong answer about the shape of your own app, and the fix for it is different from the fix for anything else here — you are not tightening a control, you are adding a part of your app to your own map of it.
Not in the way you would expect. If you said you could not explain something and the kit says it is fine, that reads CONFIRMED and the row says you were careful and it turned out well. A rollup that punished honest uncertainty would teach you to answer confidently, which is exactly the failure it exists to find.
None. It computes no number anywhere. Every line traces to a verdict a kit produced and a sentence you wrote in the hub, and it forwards each kit's own fix-first rather than inventing a priority. If it says something, one of the eleven inputs said it first.
That depends on how many. The bundle is the whole line at about a quarter off list, so if you own three or fewer it is still cheaper than buying the rest separately. If you own more than that, the three smaller bundles group the line into its natural halves and may fit better.
Find out which beliefs
about your own app are wrong.
Ten kits for the whole Past the Prototype line, plus the rollup that reads what you claimed against what was found. $141 less than buying them separately.
Sold by RedHub AI LLC · Secured by Stripe · redhub.ai