4 LLM dev tools · deterministic · CI-ready · save $97

Four ways AI breaks.One reliability stack.

AI doesn’t break in one place — it breaks in four: bad retrieval, prompt and model drift, injection attacks, and agent misbehavior. The AI Reliability Bundle is one CI-ready tool for each, plus a playbook that wires them into a single eval gate. Ship on a verdict, not a hope.

Four tools · one pipeline
RAG Retrieval Grader$89
Prompt Regression Lab$89
Prompt Injection Red Team Kit$99
Agent Reliability Harness$149
Bundle vs. separately$426
Bundle price$329
01.The Failure Surface

“Our AI works” is not a test result.

AI systems fail in four distinct places, and each is invisible to the others’ tests. The retrieval is irrelevant. A prompt tweak quietly degrades cases that used to pass. A crafted input overrides your instructions. An agent loops, calls the wrong tool, or blows its budget — and still returns a “correct” answer.

One tool can’t see all four. A passing retrieval score says nothing about injection resistance; a green prompt suite says nothing about an agent that looped five times. This bundle is one CI-ready tool for each failure mode, built to run as a single reliability gate.

02.What's Inside

Four tools. One reliability stack.

Each tool is the same full product sold on its own page — nothing trimmed for the bundle. Click any card to see the individual product page.

Included: the CI-Pipeline Playbook

A connective guide that wires all four tools into one make eval / CI gate — shared baselines, per-tool thresholds, and a single combined reliability report. Authored for the bundle, not for any one tool.

03.Why They Belong Together

One eval pipeline, gated in CI.

The four tools share the same shape — test cases in, a score and a pass/fail verdict out — so they fold into a single reliability gate.

make eval  ->  rag-grade        # retrieval quality >= threshold
               prompt-regress   # no regressions vs baseline
               redteam          # injection catch-rate >= threshold
               agent-eval       # trajectory verdict != FIX
           ->  one reliability report  ->  gate the build

One make eval gate, four lenses

The tools share the same shape — test cases in, a score and a pass/fail verdict out — so they fold into a single CI job: rag-grade, prompt-regress, redteam, agent-eval, then one combined reliability report that gates the build. The included playbook wires it.

Each blind spot is invisible to the others

A clean retrieval score says nothing about injection resistance. A correct final answer hides an agent that looped five times. A passing prompt suite says nothing about a jailbreak. You need all four lenses because no one of them can see the others' failures.

Deterministic, so it runs on every PR

All four favor deterministic, rule-based checks by default — reproducible and cheap enough to gate every pull request, with optional LLM-judge steps where useful. Shared baselines mean reliability stops being a vibe and becomes a check.

04.The Standard

One spine runs through all four.

Every tool in the stack carries the same posture: tell the truth about quality before you ship, and refuse to bless work that isn’t actually safe. Each one ships that posture as a runnable, CI-gating verdict.

Honest about the lane

These are offline / CI evaluation tools, not runtime guardrails — they don't sit in the live request path. Catch problems before you ship, then pair with runtime guardrails in production for defense in depth.

Deterministic by default

Rule-based checks that are reproducible and cheap, with no required LLM-judge bill — add a judge only where subjective grading earns it. The verdict you get today is the verdict you get tomorrow on the same inputs.

Tuned to your risk

Default thresholds and policies are sensible starting points, not a universal standard. Each tool grades what you tell it to — the quality of the gate is the quality of the cases and budgets you write.

05.Who It's For

Built for teams shipping LLMs and agents.

AI/ML engineers shipping to prod

A real reliability gate across retrieval, prompts, security, and agents — one verdict you can put in front of a release instead of a hope.

Platform & infra teams

Reproducible, cheap evals you can standardize across services and CI, with shared baselines and one combined report rather than four disconnected toolchains.

Startups & agencies building agents

Cover the whole failure surface without assembling four toolchains yourself — and leave clients with a repeatable reliability stack instead of a spreadsheet of vibes.

06.The Bundle

One purchase. Four tools. Save $97.

  • RAG Retrieval Grader$89
  • Prompt Regression Lab$89
  • Prompt Injection Red Team Kit$99
  • Agent Reliability Harness$149
  • CI-Pipeline Playbookincluded
  • Bought separately$426
$329
Save $97 · 23% off
Get the Bundle
Lifetime access · 30-day refund

Roughly the Agent Reliability Harness for free when you take the whole stack. Each tool also stands alone; see all RedHub bundles.

07.Common Questions

Answers before you ask.

Four CI-ready LLM dev tools, sold together: the RAG Retrieval Grader ($89), the Prompt Regression Lab ($89), the Prompt Injection Red Team Kit ($99), and the Agent Reliability Harness ($149) — plus a connective CI-pipeline playbook that wires them into one eval gate with shared baselines and a single reliability report. Bought separately they total $426; the bundle is $329, so you save $97.

4 dev tools · save $97 · $329

Cover the whole
failure surface.

Four CI-ready tools, one eval pipeline, one verdict you can trust — $329 instead of $426. Deterministic, offline, gate-your-build. Thirty-day refund either way.

Sold by RedHub AI LLC · Secured by Stripe · redhub.ai