The AI governance buyers andregulators actually recognize.
“Voluntary” is doing a lot of work in how people dismiss the NIST AI RMF. In practice it’s the recognized US standard-of-care — in procurement, and in the security questionnaires that gate enterprise deals.
This kit turns the framework into the artifacts people actually ask for — crosswalked to ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act.
“Voluntary” still gates your deals.
The NIST AI RMF is referenced in executive actions and state AI laws, written into federal procurement, and embedded in the enterprise security questionnaires that decide whether your AI product clears legal and infosec review. Selling upmarket without the artifacts means the deal stalls.
Turn the framework into evidence — a readiness assessment, a use-case register, model cards, and honest questionnaire answers — and audits and deals go smoothly.
The NIST AI RMF is referenced in executive actions, state laws, and procurement — and embedded in the security questionnaires that decide enterprise deals.
Selling AI upmarket means infosec and legal review. Without artifacts mapped to the framework, those questionnaires stall the deal.
The temptation is to say everything's handled. Overstating controls in a questionnaire creates exposure — honest, evidenced answers win.
NIST AI RMF 1.0 released Jan 2023; voluntary. US federal posture is shifting toward “minimally burdensome” even as several states and sector regulators tighten — treat the direction as mixed and re-verify framework versions and any cited adaptations at use.
Score a use case — honestly.
Rate a use case across the four functions and set its impact and oversight — the same logic as the included govcheck.py, which refuses to mark a high-impact, no-oversight case “Ready.”
Impact on people
Human oversight
0 = not started · 1 = ad hoc · 2 = managed · 3 = optimized
Gaps to close
58% ready
Close the gaps below before scaling this use case.
Gaps (below managed): Measure
Stand up governance buyers and regulators recognize.
A readiness assessment, use-case register, maturity scorecard, model-card and policy skeletons, and a vendor-questionnaire answer bank — crosswalked to ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act.
Get the NIST AI RMF Readiness Kit — $149Governance guidance, not legal advice. Obligations depend on your jurisdiction and sector.
Govern, Map, Measure, Manage.
The structure of the NIST AI RMF — and the spine of the assessment, the scorecard, and the readiness tool.
Stand up the policies, roles, and accountability that the other three functions hang on — the foundation reviewers look for first.
Inventory your AI systems and use cases, classify each into a risk tier, and document context — the use-case register that drives everything downstream.
Assess and track each system against the risks that matter — the function most teams are weakest on, and the one questionnaires probe hardest.
Prioritize, respond to, and monitor risks over time — including the human-oversight controls that keep a high-impact use case deployable.
A playbook, the artifacts, a workbook, and a readiness tool.
Why 'voluntary' still gates deals, the four functions end to end, turning the framework into artifacts, and a 90-day quick-start.
Model-card and policy skeletons, the AI use-case register, and the vendor-questionnaire answer bank — honest, ready to adapt.
A readiness assessment across the four functions, a maturity scorecard (On track / Gap), a risk-tiered use-case register, and a dashboard.
Score a use case for readiness — and it refuses to bless a high-impact use case with no human oversight. Zero dependencies; runs keyless.
One governance effort mapped across frameworks so you're not redoing the work three times — illustrative, not a compliance certification.
The editable readiness thresholds and risk rules behind the tool. Tune them to your sector and risk appetite.
Governance guidance — honest about the line.
- Not legal advice
This is governance guidance and ready-to-adapt artifacts — not legal advice. Obligations are jurisdiction- and sector-specific; consult counsel for anything material.
- The crosswalk is illustrative
Mapping to ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act shows how one effort serves several requirements — it is not a certification of compliance with any of them.
- Answer honestly
The answer bank is built to flag in-progress items, not overclaim. Overstating controls in a questionnaire is its own risk; honest, evidenced answers win deals.
- Re-verify at use
US posture is mixed and frameworks evolve. Re-verify the NIST/ISO/EU references and any cited adaptations before you rely on them.
Teams selling AI upmarket — and the people who own the questionnaire.
AI product teams, compliance and security leads, and fractional execs standing up governance — anyone who needs the framework buyers recognize, turned into evidence that clears review.
EU AI Act Readiness Kit
$249This kit anchors the US framework; the EU AI Act Readiness Kit covers the EU obligations — risk classification, a 30-item gap assessment, FRIAs and system cards. One governance effort, crosswalked across both.
AI Governance & Acceptable-Use Kit
$39The artifacts need policy behind them. Six editable policy templates for the moment an enterprise prospect, insurer, or auditor asks — the acceptable-use foundation under your NIST mapping.
AI Literacy & Workforce Training Kit
$199Govern includes the workforce. A turnkey AI-literacy program — deck, workbook, knowledge check, completion log — that evidences the training measures questionnaires and frameworks expect.
The questions teams actually ask before a security review.
A governance-readiness system mapped to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. It includes a readiness assessment across Govern/Map/Measure/Manage, an AI use-case register with risk tiers, a maturity scorecard, model-card and policy skeletons, a vendor-questionnaire answer bank, and a 90-day quick-start — all crosswalked to ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act, plus a tool that scores a use case for readiness.
Because in practice it's become the recognized US standard-of-care for AI: referenced in executive actions and state AI laws, written into federal procurement, and embedded in the enterprise security questionnaires that decide whether your AI product clears legal and infosec review. 'Voluntary' doesn't mean it won't gate your deals.
You score a use case across the four NIST functions (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage) and set its impact and whether there's human oversight; it returns Ready, Gaps to close, or Not ready. By design it refuses to mark a high-impact use case with no human oversight as 'ready' — even if the function scores are otherwise high. That guardrail is the point.
Security questionnaires are where AI deals stall. The answer bank gives you honest, ready-to-adapt responses mapped to common questions — and it's built to flag in-progress items rather than overclaim, because overstating your controls in a questionnaire is its own risk. Answer it honestly, and win.
No. The crosswalk is illustrative — it shows how one governance effort maps across frameworks so you're not redoing the work three times. Actual obligations are jurisdiction- and sector-specific. This is governance guidance, not legal advice; re-verify the framework versions and consult counsel for anything material.
It's the US-framework anchor of the governance suite. Pair it with the EU AI Act Readiness Kit (the EU obligations), the AI Governance & Acceptable-Use Kit (the policy templates), and the AI Literacy & Workforce Training Kit (the workforce-measures evidence).
A NIST AI RMF Playbook, Templates (model cards, policies, the answer bank, the 90-day quick-start), the NIST AI RMF Workbook (Excel), govcheck.py, and an editable config.
The governance that makes deals go smoothly.
Turn the NIST AI RMF into the artifacts buyers and regulators ask for — assessment, use-case register, maturity scorecard, model cards, and an honest answer bank, crosswalked to ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act. One-time $149, yours to keep.
Sold by RedHub AI LLC · Secured by Stripe · Governance guidance, not legal advice · redhub.ai