RedHub AIRedHub AI
Tool Gate · How it works

How the gate works

How the Web-Form Consent gate works

This tool grades a lead-capture form's prior-express-written-consent readiness. It scores 6 weighted controls into a 0–100 number — then a gate that can only make the verdict worse.

The 6 weighted controls

01Affirmative, unchecked opt-ingate · pre-checkedwt 20
02Clear, conspicuous disclosurewt 20
03Disclosure proximate to the controlwt 14
04Electronic-signature evidence recorded where prior express written consent is requiredwt 14
05Retained, dated, per-consumer recordwt 18
06Revocation honored & DNC diligencewt 14
CONSENT-READY AS DESCRIBED
score 85+
FIX FIRST
score 55+
EVIDENCE GAP
below floor
Consent-evidence gate · worsen-only

A pre-checked opt-in box (not affirmative), no retained per-consumer consent record, or purchased data with no provenance forces EVIDENCE GAP regardless of the score. If evidence of the required affirmative action or consent record is not shown, this instrument records a consent-evidence gap. It does not determine whether legally valid consent exists.

80/100
EVIDENCE GAP

Why: Disclosure, electronic-signature evidence, record-keeping, and revocation are all marked at the top — the form scores 80. But the opt-in box is pre-checked (not affirmative), and that triggers the consent-evidence gate: the instrument records a consent-evidence gap. The verdict is forced to EVIDENCE GAP regardless of the score.

Priority controlAffirmative, unchecked opt-in is at 0 — the consent box is pre-checked. It is the gate's own control, so it is named ahead of any score shortfall.

The score alone reads FIX FIRST; the gate made it worse. The score is context; the gate is the answer — and where something is short, the priority control row names it. Grades the prior-express-written-consent readiness of forms, not people, and deliberately doesn't grade the vacated one-to-one rule. A readiness aid, not legal advice — confirm your obligations with counsel.