RedHub AIRedHub AI
Tool Gate · How it works

How the roll-up gate works

How the AI UGC Ad Compliance System works

This tool grades every AI or UGC-style ad in a campaign against disclosure and claim-substantiation rules, then rolls the campaign up to its worst ad. It reads 8 ads and rolls them into one verdict — the worst, never the average — then a gate that can only make it worse.

The 8 ads

01AD-01 · synthetic testimonialfix firstrule P1 · synthetic persona, lived-experience claimPROHIBITED
02AD-02 · avatar, unbacked claimrule P2 · consented avatar, claim it can't makePROHIBITED
03AD-03 · earnings, no proofrule P3 · unsupported health / earnings claimPROHIBITED
04AD-04 · face swap, no labelrule F1 · substantive AI edit, no AI disclosureFIX
05AD-05 · synthetic, weak labelrule F2 · synthetic endorser not identified as AIFIX
06AD-06 · creator, buried #adrule F3 · material connection not conspicuousFIX
07AD-07 · bold claim, thin proofrule F4 · performance claim needs a basisFIX
08AD-08 · clean real customerrule L1 · disclosures present, claims supportedLAUNCH
GO
every ad is LAUNCH — disclosures present and conspicuous, every claim supportable
FIX
no ad is prohibited, but at least one needs a disclosure added or strengthened, or a claim substantiated
HOLD
any ad is PROHIBITED — a synthetic testimonial, a claim the speaker can't make, or an unsupported health / earnings claim
Hard-stop · worsen-only

An ad that frames a synthetic persona as giving a first-person testimonial, that has a consented avatar make a claim the real person can't, or that makes an unsupported health or earnings claim is PROHIBITED — a label can't cure it, only a rebuild. One prohibited ad holds the whole campaign at HOLD no matter how many other ads are ready to launch.

HOLD

Why: One ad is clean to launch and four only need a fix — a disclosure added or strengthened, a claim substantiated — which alone would read FIX. But three ads are PROHIBITED: a synthetic persona giving a lived-experience testimonial, a consented avatar making a claim the real person can't, and an unsupported earnings claim. A label can't cure any of them, and one prohibited ad holds the whole campaign, so the gate reads HOLD. 3 of 8 ads PROHIBITED · 4 FIX · 1 LAUNCH · worst-not-average.

Fix firstAD-01 synthetic testimonial — a synthetic persona is framed as having used the product, a first-person claim it can't substantiate. Reframe it — drop the personal-experience claim or use a real customer; disclosure won't cure it, so it's the hard stop to clear first.

No single ad is the crisis — the clustering is. The roll-up takes the worst, the gate escalates when trouble compounds, and it names the one thing to fix first. Not legal advice and not a compliance certification. Triage and documentation support — it grades each ad's structure, never a person, and does not guarantee against FTC enforcement or a platform takedown. Dated figures (penalty amounts, state-law amounts, the EU AI Act Article 50 date) move quickly; verify against primary sources and have counsel review anything high-stakes.