RedHub AIRedHub AI
Tool Gate · How it works

How the roll-up gate works

How the Inferred-Fact & Unstated-Assumption Trace works

This tool grades every fact in each finished deliverable, rolls the deliverable up to its weakest material fact, then the portfolio up to its weakest deliverable. It reads 4 deliverables and rolls them into one verdict — the worst, never the average — then a gate that can only make it worse.

The 4 deliverables

01Vendor risk memofix first6 material facts · 33% asserted · F-05 demoted, rests on unsourced F-04RESTS ON ASSUMPTION
02Renewal summary2 material of 3 · 50% asserted · F-08 derives from F-20, absent from the traceRESTS ON ASSUMPTION
03Pricing note2 material of 3 · 50% asserted · F-11 derivable and holdsINFERRED
04Contact sheet2 material of 2 · 100% assertedGROUNDED
GROUNDED
every deliverable's material facts trace back to a named source
INFERRED
a deliverable rests on a stated derivation rule, none on an assumption
RESTS ON ASSUMPTION
any deliverable has a material fact that arrived from nowhere sourced
Propagation demotion · worsen-only

A fact can name its inputs and state its rule and still be an assumption, because something underneath it is assumed. The trace follows every derivation back up to ten levels and demotes the ones standing on nothing, so a fact that reads DERIVABLE on its own row becomes ASSUMED. A deliverable is its weakest material fact and the portfolio is its weakest deliverable — worst-not-average, and the grounding percentage decides nothing.

RESTS ON ASSUMPTION

Why: Contact sheet is GROUNDED and Pricing note is INFERRED — but two deliverables rest on an assumption. In the Vendor risk memo, F-05 names F-04 as its input and applies a sensible rule, yet nothing ever sourced F-04, so F-05 is demoted from DERIVABLE to ASSUMED — a failure one row away that no claim-by-claim review sees. The Renewal summary's F-08 derives from F-20, a fact not in the trace at all. The portfolio is its weakest deliverable, so it reads RESTS ON ASSUMPTION even at 50% grounding. 2 of 4 deliverables rest on assumption · 50% of 12 material facts asserted · worst-not-average.

Fix firstVendor risk memo — F-04. It is unsourced, and F-05 is built on top of it, so sourcing F-04 lifts F-05 with it. Fix the root, not the symptom; the trace names F-04, never F-05.

No single deliverable is the crisis — the clustering is. The roll-up takes the worst, the gate escalates when trouble compounds, and it names the one thing to fix first. Grades the facts you record about a deliverable — never people, and never runs an agent. It does not fetch or verify your sources: GROUNDED means each material fact traces back to a source you named, not that the source says what you think. A working aid, not legal, audit, or compliance advice.