RedHub AIRedHub AI
Tool Gate · How it works

How the gate works

Devil's Advocate Board

This tool grades a big go/no-go decision across five adversarial lenses. It scores 5 weighted controls into a 0–100 number — then two gates that can only make the verdict worse.

The 5 weighted controls

01The Skeptic · evidencewt 22
02The Customer · demandwt 22
03The CFO · downsidevetowt 20
04The Operator · executionwt 18
05The Contrarian · kill-shotwt 18
GO
score 78+
GO WITH CONDITIONS
score 78+, a lens above 1, up to 2, and none at 1 or below
NOT YET
score 55+
NO-GO
below floor
Veto gate · worsen-only

Any lens scored 1 or below is a fatal objection — it forces NO-GO regardless of the score. A high conviction number cannot outvote a single dealbreaker.

Caution gate · worsen-only

At a conviction of 78 or more, a lens scored above 1, up to 2, is a serious reservation rather than a veto: the verdict reads GO WITH CONDITIONS instead of GO, and each such lens is listed as a condition to clear first.

64.4/100
NO-GO

Why: The CFO scored the downside 1 of 5 — a fatal veto — so the board reads NO-GO despite a conviction of 64.4.

Fix firstResolve the CFO's downside objection — prove the cost of being wrong is survivable — before anything else.

The score alone reads NOT YET; the gate made it worse. The score is context; the gate is the answer — and where something is short, the fix first row names it. A decision stress-test, not a decision-maker. Scores a case you describe; the call is yours.