RedHub AIRedHub AI
Tool Gate · How it works

How the gate works

How the Cost-of-Poor-Quality gate works

This tool grades a manufacturing cell's true cost of poor quality against its own revenue. It scores 5 weighted controls into a 0–100 number — then a gate that can only make the verdict worse.

The 5 weighted controls

01Scrapwt 6
02Reworkwt 9
03Containmentwt 4
04Warranty/returnsgate - dominant streamwt 75
05Expeditewt 6
CONTROLLED
score 70+
COST DRAG
score 25+
BLEEDING
below floor
Dominance gate · worsen-only

A single cost stream that is both 60%+ of the cell's total COPQ dollars and over a $25,000 floor forces BLEEDING regardless of the ratio-only score - a concentrated leak in one stream is a different problem than the same dollars spread thin, and a ratio alone would hide it.

25/100
BLEEDING

Why: The five weighted streams score 25 - COST DRAG on their own math, since no stream is a runaway on its own weight. But Warranty/returns is $52,000, 75% of this cell's $69,000 total COPQ (7.7% of $900,000 revenue) and clears the $25,000 concentration floor - the dominance gate forces BLEEDING regardless of the ratio.

Fix firstAttack Warranty/returns first - it is 75% of this cell's COPQ ($52,000), the concentrated leak driving the gate. Cut it below the 60% dominance share (or under $25,000) and the verdict releases to its ratio band.

A high score didn’t save it. The score is context; the gate is the answer — and it names the one thing to fix first. Your own cost inputs, computed offline. Not an audited financial figure or an industry benchmark.