RedHub AIRedHub AI
Tool Gate · How it works

How the gate works

How the Attribution Integrity Ledger gate works

This tool grades a marketing attribution report's integrity, not its accuracy. It scores 6 weighted controls into a 0–100 number — then a gate that can only make the verdict worse.

The 6 weighted controls

01Model declaredwt 20
02Deterministic methodwt 18
03Data completenesswt 18
04Version-pinnedwt 16
05Credit reconcilesgate · ledger doesn't sum to 100% per dealwt 16
06Owner documentedwt 12
TRUST THE NUMBER
score 75+
LEAKY
below floor
BLACK BOX
a deal's credit doesn't reconcile to 100%, or a touchpoint fires no rule
Reconciliation gate · worsen-only

Every deal's credit must sum to 100% (plus or minus 0.5%) across its touchpoints, and every touchpoint must have fired a rule. Either failure floors the verdict to BLACK BOX regardless of the documentation score - the gate checks the ledger's arithmetic, not what the marks say about it.

69/100
BLACK BOX

Why: The documentation marks alone score 69/100 - model declared and the method is deterministic, but data completeness, version-pinning, and credit reconciliation are only partially documented. That reads LEAKY on paper. But Acme Corp's actual ledger sums to 115% across two touchpoints (40% webinar-30day plus 75% last-touch) - a double-count. A report whose credit doesn't reconcile is a dashboard estimate, not a calculation, so the gate floors it to BLACK BOX.

Fix firstFix the double-counted Acme Corp touchpoint (webinar-30day 40% + last-touch 75% = 115%, not 100%) so the ledger reconciles. Fix first: credit reconciles.

A high score didn’t save it. The score is context; the gate is the answer — and it names the one thing to fix first. Grades a report's documentation and arithmetic integrity, not its accuracy. Doesn't validate the attribution model's underlying assumptions and scores no person.