RedHub AI
How the roll-up gate works
How the AI Disclosure & Labeling gate works
This tool grades your AI surfaces against EU AI Act Article 50 transparency obligations. It reads 6 AI surfaces and rolls them into one verdict — the worst, never the average — then a gate that can only make it worse.
The 6 AI surfaces
A synthetic surface presented as real with no machine-readable mark — a deepfake ad with no label — is deceptive, and one deceptive surface carries the whole set to EVIDENCE GAPS PRESENT AS DESCRIBED however clean the rest is. Undisclosed synthetic content passed off as real is the exact harm Article 50 targets.
Why: Four of six surfaces are clear and one is only partly marked — but the spokesperson "deepfake" ad is presented as real with no machine-readable mark and no deepfake label. That's a deceptive synthetic surface, and one deceptive surface carries the whole set to EVIDENCE GAPS PRESENT AS DESCRIBED however clean the rest is: undisclosed synthetic content passed off as real is exactly what Article 50 targets.
Most surfaces can be labeled — but one synthetic surface passed off as real with no disclosure is dispositive: an undisclosed deepfake ad sinks the whole set. The roll-up takes the worst surface, the deceptive-surface gate carries the set to EVIDENCE GAPS PRESENT AS DESCRIBED regardless of the score, and where a surface is short, the fix first row names it. A pre-publish readiness audit for EU AI Act Article 50 transparency obligations — not a conformity assessment, not legal advice, and not a watermarking or detection tool. It reports which Article 50 disclosures the law expects for each surface and whether you say you carry them; "EVIDENCE GAPS PRESENT AS DESCRIBED" describes the disclosure evidence you entered, not your legal position. Article 50 transparency is separate from the high-risk (Annex III) regime (deadline 2 Dec 2027); this kit asserts no August-2026 high-risk deadline. The Act’s text and timelines are still moving — confirm current obligations with qualified counsel.