RedHub AI
How the roll-up gate works
How the AI Literacy Evidence & Article 4 Readiness Kit works
This tool grades each in-scope role's AI-literacy evidence - inventory, role-to-system mapping, training record, and proportionality - then rolls the organization up to its weakest role. It reads 4 roles and rolls them into one verdict — the worst, never the average — then a gate that can only make it worse.
The 4 roles
A role that operates an AI system with no training record is UNEVIDENCED regardless of its other scores — you cannot evidence Article 4 AI literacy for people using AI with nothing on file. One such role forces the whole organization to NOT DEFENSIBLE, and the headline is the weakest in-scope role, never the average.
Why: Two roles are fully evidenced (100, 79) and the mean reads 65 - but the headline is the weakest in-scope role, not the average. Sales reps operate an AI CRM assistant with a training record at zero, so the untrained-operator gate forces that role to UNEVIDENCED even though its 47 would otherwise read PARTIAL; Recruiters sit at 32. Any UNEVIDENCED in-scope role makes the organization NOT DEFENSIBLE. (Finance uses no AI and is out of scope.)
No single role is the crisis — the clustering is. The roll-up takes the worst, the gate escalates when trouble compounds, and it names the one thing to fix first. Not legal advice. This kit builds an evidence record; it does not certify compliance, is not a conformity assessment, and scores no person. The EU AI Act Article 4 AI-literacy obligation has applied since Feb 2025, with penalty and governance provisions phasing in from Aug 2025, and the dates shift as the Commission's Omnibus simplification package settles. Confirm your current obligations with qualified counsel.